Deficits and target strategies
In RankGear, a deficit is the direction-aware gap between a tracked page's value for a factor and the goal set for that factor[1] . The deficit strategy decides how that goal is drawn from the competing pages: the field average, the maximum after an outlier guard, or the competitor mean plus 1, 1.5 or 2 standard deviations[2] . The maker says the strategy "changes the target, never the measured values"[2] .
Overview
Before RankGear can say where a page falls short, it needs a target value for each factor[5] . The deficit strategy is the setting that draws that target from the comparison set, and it applies the same rule across every factor in a run, so goals, deficits, scores and priorities all trace back to it[5] . It is chosen when setting up an Analysis Run, an On-Page Audit or a Bulk Run[5] .
What a deficit is
A deficit carries a sign, so it shows both the size of the gap and the direction the page needs to move[1] . RankGear reports a deficit only where improvement is still indicated; once a page meets or passes the goal for a factor, that factor no longer shows a gap[1] . In the glossary's example, a page of 900 words against a goal of about 1,450 has a deficit of roughly 550 words in the "add more" direction[1] .
The glossary advises against treating any deficit as a target in isolation: "a large gap on a weakly correlated factor usually matters less than a smaller gap on a factor the SERP clearly rewards"[1] . A deficit whose factor also clears the run's correlation threshold is labeled a Significant Deficit[6] .
Average and maximum targets
The Average Strategy sets each factor's target to the arithmetic mean of the competing pages, aiming for the middle of the field rather than its ceiling[7] . RankGear's feature page calls it "a balanced default"[8] . Because it uses the mean, a few pages with very high or very low values can pull the target toward them[7] .
The Maximum Strategy is described as the most aggressive option, aiming the page at "the guarded highest value found among the top-ranking competitors"[3] . In the glossary's example, five pages have word counts of 1,180, 1,340, 1,520, 1,600 and an outlier of 4,200; the Average Strategy might target about 1,500 words, while the Maximum Strategy targets the guarded high of about 1,600 and holds back the 4,200-word outlier[3] . On a broad keyword it can produce a long list of demanding deficits that are impractical to close at once[3] .
Standard-deviation targets
Standard deviation measures how much the values of a variable vary around their average; in a normal distribution about 68.3% of values fall within one standard deviation of the average and 95.4% within two[9] . RankGear's three standard-deviation strategies add one, one and a half or two sample standard deviations to the competitor mean, producing progressively more aggressive targets that account for the field's spread[8] .
| Strategy | Target | Glossary example |
|---|---|---|
| Average | Competitor mean | Mean 1,200 words gives a 1,200-word target[10] |
| Mean + 1 SD | Mean plus one sample standard deviation | Mean 1,200, SD 300 gives 1,500 words[10] |
| Mean + 1.5 SD | Mean plus 1.5 sample standard deviations | Mean 1,850, SD 300 gives 2,300 words[11] |
| Mean + 2 SD | Mean plus two sample standard deviations | Mean 1,200, SD 300 gives 1,800 words[12] |
Because the step scales with the spread, tightly clustered competitors give a gentle target and widely varying ones a steep one[10] . The glossary warns that on high-variance factors the two-standard-deviation target can land above every individual competitor[12] , and that on a skewed or bimodal factor a mean-plus-one target "can point at a value no strong competitor actually holds"[10] . With only a handful of competitors, the sample standard deviation is unstable[12] .
The extreme outlier guard
The Extreme-Outlier Guard is a safeguard in RankGear's deficit math that stops one implausibly extreme competitor value from becoming the Maximum target[4] . The glossary's example has nine of ten pages using a factor between 8 and 15 times and the tenth using it 240 times; the guard flags the 240 as detached from the rest and holds the target at the upper band the other nine describe[4] . The glossary notes that the guard "does not erase the underlying variability," so a wide spread among the remaining pages still calls for judgment[4] .
Choosing a strategy
RankGear's glossary says a more aggressive strategy pushes targets toward the strongest competitors and moves more factors up the roadmap, while a more conservative one pulls targets toward the middle and narrows the gaps[5] . The same page and competitors can produce different deficits, scores and priorities under different strategies, so the strategy behind a report should be noted[5] . The optimization score also depends on it: a stricter target lowers the same page's score[13] .
Targets are drawn from the measured results and are "comparative indicators of what ranking pages look like, not Google's own scores"[5] . The correlation that should be weighed beside each deficit is explained in Spearman and Pearson correlation, and its limits in Correlation and causation in SEO.
Common questions
What is a deficit in SEO analysis?
In RankGear, a deficit is the signed gap between a page's value for a factor and the goal set for it[1] . It is reported only while the page still has room to move toward the goal[1] .
What is a deficit strategy?
It is the method that turns competitor values into a target for each factor, which then sets the deficit, score and roadmap priority[5] . RankGear offers average, guarded maximum and mean plus 1, 1.5 or 2 standard deviations[2] .
What does mean plus one standard deviation mean?
It sets the target at the competitor average plus one sample standard deviation[10] . With competitors averaging 1,200 words and a standard deviation of 300, the target is 1,500 words[10] .
Why guard against outliers?
Without a guard, one competitor with an extreme value could set a Maximum target that no ordinary ranking page comes close to[4] . RankGear's guard holds the target at the realistic high end of the other pages[4] .
See also
- Analysis Run
- Correlation and causation in SEO
- Spearman and Pearson correlation
- BM25 and BM25F
- SEO testing
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h "Deficit". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b c d e "Methodology: What RankGear measures". RankGear (rankgear.com). Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b c d "Maximum strategy". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b c d e f "Extreme outlier guard". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i "Deficit strategy". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ "Significant deficit". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b "Average strategy". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b "Analysis Run: measure the ranking field for a keyword". RankGear (rankgear.com). Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ "Standard deviation". Wikipedia. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b c d e f "One standard deviation strategy". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ "1.5 standard deviations strategy". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ a b c "Two standard deviations strategy". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.
- ^ "Optimization score". RankGear knowledge base. Retrieved November 2026.